LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Find Resources
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: Ielsch Francis<Francis.Ielsch@e...>
    Date: Wed May 4 11:01:03 CEST 2005
    Subject: [oc] Wishbone in UART16550
    Top
    Hello,
    I'm using the UART16550 core and there is something related to the
    implementation of wishbone that I disagree with.
    Under uart_top.v are 2 modules: uart_regs.v and uart_wb.v. Wishbone
    control signals are only provided to uart_wb.v and uart_regs.v receive
    address and data buses. I'm upsetted with the fact that uart_regs.v
    doesn't receive the strobe signal. Thus this module drives the output
    data bus even if the master isn't talking to it (strobe not asserted for
    this slave).
    I know that the wb_dat_i input of the master is a muxtiplexing of the
    wb_dat_o of all slave so it doesn't disturb when a slave drives its
    wb_dat_o whereas the master is talking to an other slave. However, I
    think it would be better that wishbone's slaves doesn't have any
    activity as long as they are not addressed.

    As I'm a new Wishbone user, I may be wrong. What are Wishbone Wizards
    thinking about my opinion ?
    Regards,
    Fran6
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: attachment.htm

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.