LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Find Resources
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: ssureshgandhi@y...
    Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:31:21 -0100
    Subject: Re: [oc] Complex multiplier implementation via CORDIC ?
    Top

    Hi Nanson,
    it is possible to convert rectangular to polar using CORDIC.
    CORDIC has got two modes 
    1. Rectngular Mode
    2. Vectoring Mode
    In vectoring mode we convert rectangular to polar co-ordinates.Please 
    refer Computer Arithmetic,Algorithm and Hardware By Behrooz 
    Parhami,Chapter 25(I think).He has explained the entire family of 
    algorithms very neatly.References given are also good.If u have any 
    doubts please mail to ssureshgandhi@y...
    In case if I have given any info already known to u ,please adjust
    Suresh Gandhi,
    Bangalore,
    India
    
    
    
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: NansonHuang@i...  
    To: cores@o...  
    Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 20:39:18 +0800 
    Subject: [oc] Complex multiplier implementation via CORDIC ? 
    
    > 
    > 
    > Dear opencore elites, 
    > 
    >   I have a problem about CORDIC to consult. Now we have input 
    > signals 
    > (a+bj) and (c+dj). We would like to compute the product of two 
    > signals 
    > instead of complex multiplier for area and power etc. reduction. As 
    > I know, 
    > CORDIC could deal with the problem. Suppose that the product of two 
    > signals 
    > is (ac-bd)+(bc+ad)j. How could we utilize the CORDIC to compute the 
    > real 
    > and imagary part (ac-bd), (bc+ad) respectively ? Does it firstly 
    > translate 
    > the a+bj and c+dj to R1exp(jtheta1) and R2'exp(jtheta2) ? 
    > Appreciate for 
    > your any comments or references. 
    > 
    > All the best, 
    > 
    > Nanson 
    > 
    
    
    
     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.